شخصیت آینده نگر و بهره وری منابع انسانی: تحلیل نقش میانجی و تعدیل گر مسیر شغلی حرفه محور و مهارت سیاسی (مورد مطالعه: کارکنان بندر امام خمینی (ره))

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سمنان، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سمنان، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده علوم اقتصادی و اداری، دانشگاه لرستان

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر، بررسی تاثیر شخصیت آینده نگر بر بهره وری منابع انسانی بندر امام خمینی (ره) با نقش میانجی و تعدیلگر، مسیرشغلی حرفه محور و مهارت سیاسی می باشد.روش پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر نحوه جمع آوری اطلاعات، توصیفی از نوع همبستگی می باشد. جامعه آماری این پژوهش، کارکنان بندر امام خمینی (ره) می باشند. برمبنای نمونه گیری تصادفی ساده، 162پرسشنامه صحیح عودت داده شد و با استفاده از نرم افزارهای SPSS و Smart-PLS داده های پژوهش مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند. برای سنجش متغیرهای پژوهش از پرسشنامه شخصیت آینده نگر جواهار و لیو (2016)، بهره وری هرسی و گلداسمیت (1980)، مسیرشغلی حرفه محور بریسکو و هال (2006) و مهارت سیاسی فریس و همکاران(2005) استفاده شده است. شخصیت آینده نگر بر بهره وری منابع انسانی تاثیر مستقیم و معناداری دارد و هم به طور غیرمستقیم از طریق میانجی گری مسیر شغلی حرفه محور و تعدیلگری مهارت سیاسی بر بهره وری منابع انسانی تاثیر معناداری دارد. نتایج پژوهش در حوزه شخصیت آینده نگر و مسیرشغلی حرفه محور، نوآوری هایی به همراه داشته است و به مدیران سازمان ها در درک تاثیرگذاری شخصیت آینده نگر بر بهره وری منابع انسانی با میانجی گری مسیر شغلی حرفه محور و تعدیلگری مهارت سیاسی کمک می کند تا موجبات بهره وری منابع انسانی را فراهم نمایند

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Futuristic Personality and Human Resource Productivity: Analyzing The Mediating and Moderating Role of Protein Career Path and Political Skills (Case: Imam Khomeini Port Staff)

نویسندگان [English]

  • alireza modhaddam 1
  • mahdieh vishlaghi 2
  • meysam jafari 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University
2 Ph.D Candidate, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University
3 . Ph.D Candidate, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Lorestan University.
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of futuristic personality on the productivity of human resources at Imam Khomeini Port with a mediating and moderating role, career-oriented job path and political skills. The method of the present study is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-correlational in terms of data collection. The statistical population of the study is the staff of Imam Khomeini port. Based on simple random sampling, 162 correct questionnaires were returned and the research data were analyzed using SPSS and Smart-PLS software. To examine the research variables, the Jeweler and Liu (2016) Futuristic Personality Questionnaire, Hershey & Goldsmith Productivity (1980), Briscoe & Hall (2006), Career-Based Career, and the Political Skills of Ferris et al. (2005) were used. Prospective personality has a direct and significant effect on human resource productivity and also indirectly has a significant effect on human resource productivity through mediation of career-oriented career path and adjustment of political skills. The results of research in the field of futuristic personality and career-oriented career path, has brought innovations and to managers of organizations in understanding the impact of futuristic personality on human resource productivity through the mediation of career-oriented career and moderation Political skills help to make human resources more productive.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Futuristic Personality
  • Human Resource Productivity
  • Career-Oriented Job
  • Political Skills
  • Imam Khomeini Port
Abili, Kh., & Jahed, H. A. (2010). Identification of Organizational Factors Affecting Productivity of Middle Managers. Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences, 1(39), 105-83
Adegoke, B. (2013). Effect of training on employees' productivity in public service organisation. GRIN Verlag.
Antony, J. P., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2010). Measuring organizational performance and organizational excellence of SMEs – Part 2: An empirical study on SMEs in India. Measuring Business Excellence, 14(3), 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683041011074209
Banister, C. M., & Meriac, J. P. (2014). Political skill and work attitudes: A comparison of multiple social effectiveness constructs. The Journal of Psychology, 149(8), 775-795. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2014.979127
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202
Briscoe, J. P., & Hall, D. T. (2006). The interplay of boundaryless and protean careers: Combinations and implications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.09.002
Caliendo, L., Mion, G., Opromolla, L. D., & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2015). Productivity and organization in Portuguese firms. https://doi.org/10.3386/w21811
Choi, H., & Thompson, L. (2005). Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(2), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.06.003
Crant, J. M., Hu, J., & Jiang, K. (2017). Proactive personality: A twentyyear review. In S. K. Parker & U. Bindl (Eds.), Proactivity at work (pp. 193–225). London, UK: Routledge
Debra, M. A., Turner, J. E., & Fletcher, T. D. (2006). Linking proactive personality and the Big Five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 927-935. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.927.
De Clercq, D., Haq, I. U., Azeem, M. U., & Ahmad, H. N. (2019). The relationship between workplace incivility and helping behavior: Roles of job dissatisfaction and political skill. The Journal of Psychology, 153(5), 507-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2019.1567453
Dorman, J., & Adams, J. (2005). Associations between students' perceptions of classroom environment and academic efficacy in Australian and British secondary schools. Westminster Studies in Education, 27(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140672040270106
Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J., Douglas, C., & Frink, D. D. (2005). Development and validation of the political skill inventory. Journal of Management, 31(1), 126-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304271386
Fuli, L., Chen, T., Chen, N. Y., Bai, Y., & Crant, J. M. (2019). Proactive yet reflective? Materializing proactive personality into creativity through job reflective learning and activated positive affective states. Personnel Psychology, 73(3), 459-489. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12370
Fuller, B., & Marler, L. E. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 329-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008
Gill, A., Lapalme, M.-_E., & S_eguin, M. (2014). When politics meets ethics: How political skill helps ethical leaders foster organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Managerial Issues, 26, 204–218.
Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002
Hall, D. T. (2004). The protean career: A quarter-century journey. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.006
Hersey P, Goldsmith M. A.(1980). situational approach to performance planning. Training and Development Journal. 1; 34(11):38.
Hirschi, A., Jaensch, V. K., & Herrmann, A. (2016). Protean career orientation, vocational identity, and self-efficacy: An empirical clarification of their relationship. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(2), 208-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2016.1242481
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199902)20:23.0.co;2-7
Jawahar, I., & Liu, Y. (2016). Proactive personality and citizenship performance. Career Development International, 21(4), 378-401.
Khalifa, G.S.A. and N. Fawzy.(2017). Measuring E-service quality (Expectation vs Perception) from travel agencies perspective an empirical study on Egyptian hotel websites. Intl. J. Recent Trends Bus. Tour., 1: 36-48.
Kim, T., Hon, A. H., & Crant, J. M. (2009). Proactive personality, employee creativity, and newcomer outcomes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(1), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9094-4
Kiran, D. R. (2020). Work organization and methods engineering for productivity. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Li, N., Liang, J., & Crant, J. M. (2010). The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: A relational perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 395-404. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018079
Niles, S.G., Herr, E.L., & Hartung, P.J. (2002). Adult career development in contemporary society. In S. G. Niles (Ed.), Adult career development: Concepts, issues and practices (pp. 3-20). Columbus, OH: National Career Development Association.
Oyewunmi, O. A., Omotayo, A. O., Hezekiah, O. F., Olusola, J. O. (2017). Optimization by Integration: A Corporate Governance and Human Resource Management Dimension. International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(1), pp 265-272
Presbitero, A. (2015). Proactivity in career development of employees. Career Development International, 20(5), 525-538. https://doi.org/10.1108/cdi-03-2015-0043
Singh, S. K., & Singh, A. P. (2019). Interplay of organizational justice, psychological empowerment, organizational citizenship behavior, and job satisfaction in the context of circular economy. Management Decision, 57(4), 937-952. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-09-2018-0966
Spitzmuller, M., & Van Dyne, L. (2012). Proactive and reactive helping: Contrasting the positive consequences of different forms of helping. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), 560-580. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1848
Sullivan, John. (2011). Increasing Employee Productivity: The Strategic Role That HR Essentially Ignores, Management Research, Vol. 49Iss: 15, pp.20– 30
Sun, S., & van Emmerik, H. I. (2015). Are proactive personalities always beneficial? Political skill as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 966-975. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037833
Tolentino, L. R., Garcia, P. R., Lu, V. N., Restubog, S. L., Bordia, P., & Plewa, C. (2014). Career adaptation: The relation of adaptability to goal orientation, proactive personality, and career optimism. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(1), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.11.004
Treadway, D. C., Ferris, G. R., Duke, A. B., Adams, G. L., & Thatcher, J. B. (2007). The moderating role of subordinate political skill on supervisors' impressions of subordinate ingratiation and ratings of subordinate interpersonal facilitation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 848-855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.848
Wetzels, Odekerken-Schröder, & Van Oppen. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
Zhang, Y., Crant, J. M., & Weng, Q. (2019). Role stressors and counterproductive work behavior: The role of negative affect and proactive personality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27(3), 267-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12255